Thursday, October 15, 2009

British victims of terrorism abroad could get £1m payout


London Evening Standard,  Kiran Randhawa...15th October, 2009

Britons caught up in terror attacks abroad could get up to £1million in compensation from the Government, under plans revealed today.

Ministers are considering setting up a fund for those injured in atrocities overseas. It would be the first time British victims receive such payouts.

The £250,000 cap for those in attacks on British soil could also be lifted. But campaigners fear the Government will go back on a commitment to make payments retrospective. Those injured in the Bali and the Mumbai attacks could be left without a penny.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Home Secretary Alan Johnson are said to be in favour of retrospective payments but face opposition from some of the Cabinet. A Whitehall source said: "We want to sort this."

Labour MP Ian McCartney said: "You cannot have two classes of citizen, where as soon as you put a toenail over the English Channel you are denied rights." Will Pike, 29, left unable to walk after the Mumbai bombings last year, said: "The overall cost would be £20million which, in the grand scheme of the war on terrorism, is not a lot."

Sunday, September 13, 2009

CVIC: Campaign for Innocent VIctims in Conflict

Campaign for Innocent VIctims in Conflict is fighting for recognition and help for civilians who are  caught in the crossfire of armed conflict.Every day, stories of civilian suffering appear in the news—from Iraq and Afghanistan, to Gaza, Sri Lanka and the Philippines. You can imagine who they are. For without their injuries and loved ones killed in the blink of an eye, they had lives we would recognize as similar to our own, with all the joys and trials of everyday life. But too often, these ordinary civilians are left to mourn in the wake of tragedy with no recognition and little help to recover.

Avoiding civilians is always the goal, yet we know that harm occurs in war. There is no official obligation for warring parties to do anything but walk away from devastated communities. CIVIC is changing that status quo by challenging warring parties to recognize and help innocent civilians harmed the world over. Our message is simple but groundbreaking: help where you have harmed

.



Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Nepali victims of terror seek promised compensations of Church bomb blast

NEPAL: Blast victims seek government compensation


By UNION OF CATHOLIC ASIAN NEWS
KATHMANDU (UCAN) – Family members of those killed and injured in the Assumption Church bomb blast are still hoping for compensation promised by the government, which has been delayed.

Newly elected Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal, during a visit to the church immediately after the blast, had promised compensation as soon as he had finalized his Cabinet.
That was delayed by political infighting and now, despite a Cabinet in place, the government is suggesting the victims could face more delays.
Home Ministry spokesperson Nabin Ghimire told UCA News on June 30 that “we are currently formulating a new set of norms regarding compensation in such cases and we will be able to look into all such cases only after the norms are finalized.”
The blast killed three people and injured 13 others.
Hira John, an uncle of Deepa Patrick, who died in the blast on May 23, told UCA News he hopes the government will make good on its promise.
“We aren’t expecting more from the church as it has been doing everything it can for the treatment of the injured,” said John, who is also the uncle of two injured Indian girls, Monica Simon and Moni Patrick.
Simon and Patrick underwent treatment for at least three weeks after the blast.
“Although the girls are out of hospital now, their wounds are yet to heal,” John said, adding they intend to seek further treatment in their hometown of Patna, in India’s Bihar state. “We are hoping that the government acts on its promise and gives us some kind of compensation,” he added.
Balan Joseph, 41, who lost his wife and daughter in the blast, said he felt it was the government’s “duty” to compensate the victims.
“Whatever the church has been doing is commendable and the love and concern it is showing is enough for me, but now it is the government’s duty to see to it that the victims are paid some damages,” he said.
Another of the injured, Sun Bahadur Tamang, 49, whose wife was seriously injured in the blast and remains in hospital in Kathmandu, agreed that “the church is already doing its bit by bearing the entire cost of treatment of the injured.”
“It is now the government’s turn to do its part,” he said, adding that “whatever the government can give us will at least be some relief for all of us.”
Father Robin Rai, parochial vicar at Assumption Church, said the church is “considering” coming up with a “support package” for the blast victims. However, he acknowledged that “we cannot give them much as the church has limited funds.”
He said the church has received donations from individuals and social organizations both from within and outside the country but that was insufficient to give the victims “good” compensation.
Meanwhile, the Kathmandu District Court on June 29 denied bail to Sita Thapa Shrestha, the woman accused of planting the pressure cooker bomb inside the church.
“During proceedings on June 29, the court did not find any evidence that suggested that Shrestha did not commit the crime, while there was plenty of evidence that proved her involvement. As such the court could not grant her bail,” Bed Prasad Timilsina, an official at the Lalitpur District Court, told UCA News.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

The Road Less Travelled: Implementing the UN Global Counterterrorism Strategy in South Asia

Implementing the UN Global Counterterrorism Strategy in Asia
Panel Discussions - Thursday, November 13, 2008

On November 13th-14th, the International Peace Institute (IPI) together with the Center for Global Counterterrorism Cooperation (CGCTC) convened a roundtable of counterterrorism practitioners and experts to discuss “Implementing the United Nations Global Counterterrorism Strategy in South Asia.”

 Held in IPI’s Trygve Lie Center, the two-day workshop sought to identify ways in which the UN’s Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy could be better promoted and implemented by bringing together a wide range of stakeholders to explore the role of the Strategy and the challenges it faces. Among the forty-plus participants were representatives from South Asian governments, the UN, regional think tanks, and other civil society groups from, or working on, the region.

Building on past work by IPI and the CGCTC on this subject, the discussion and the resultant project report will contribute to improving the UN’s capacity to better understand and counter transnational security challenges, strengthening the response capacities of national, regional, and international actors, and enhancing counterterrorism cooperation in South Asia.

A cocktail reception following the discussions allowed for increased interaction among the conference participants, diplomats, experts, and the broader UN community in New York.

Welcoming Remarks
Edward Luck,
IPI Senior Vice President and Director of Studies

Alistair Millar,
Center for Global Counterterrorism Cooperation (CGCTC)

Speakers and Moderators
Imtiaz Ahmed,
Department of International Relations, Dhaka University, Bangladesh

Richard Barrett,
UN Security Council Al-Qaida/Taliban Sanctions Analytical and Monitoring Team

Laila Bokhari,
Norwegian Defense Research Establishment

Eva Buzsa,
UN Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force; Executive Office of the Secretary-General

Suba Chandran,
Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, India

Christopher Coleman,
United Nations Department of Political Affairs (UNDPA)

Kishore Dash,
Thunderbird School of International Management

Sreeradha Datta,
Institute of Defense Studies and Analysis, India

Naureen Chowdhury Fink,
IPI Program Officer

Shirani de Fontgalland,
Legal and Constitutional Affairs Division, Commonwealth Secretariat, United Kingdom

Bushra Gohar,
Awami National Party, Member National Assembly, Pakistan

John Hirsch,
IPI Senior Adviser

Nigel Inkster,
International Institute for Strategic Studies, UK

Christian Mahr,
United Nations Counterterrorism Committee Executive Directorate

Eric Rosand,
CGCTC

Shambhu Ram Simkhada,
Peace and Conflict Management Committee, Government of Nepal

Farooq Sobhan,
Bangladesh Enterprise Institute, Bangladesh

Monday, November 3, 2008

European Union Developing Standards for Assistance to Victims of Terrorism Compensation and Reparation

The paper below authored by a European Union expert presents guidelines for developing the standards of assistance to the victims of terror. Given our social economic conditions and lack of efficient public health care and education system, it is vital for us to make special provisions for those who lost their lives due to terrorist attacks in the cities.

Please read the paper below:

http://www.euforumrj.org/readingroom/Terrorism/Compensationpresentation.pdf

Thursday, October 30, 2008

UN GLOBAL COUNTER TERRORISM STRATEGY 2008

UN Global Counter Terrorism Strategy is the primary document that deals with the victims of terror worldwide. Pakistan is one of the signatory of the UN Strategy and is obliged to implement the recommendations of the Strategy.


http://www.globalct.org/images/content/pdf/reports/strengthening_a_critical_partnership.pdf

Monday, September 8, 2008

UN Press Conference on Support to Victims of Terrorism

On 8th September 2008. Robert Orr, Assistant Secretary-General and Chair of the Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force, chaired a symposium on supporting victims of terrorism –- the first of its kind at the United Nations.  Mr Orr, declared the victims of terrorism, “one of the most neglected types of victims in the world today”. 


Following is the brief Press Conference report issued by the Department of Public Information • News and Media Division • New York


Please Read On


PRESS CONFERENCE BY CHAIR OF COUNTER-TERRORISM IMPLEMENTATION TASK FORCE ON SECRETARY-GENERAL’S SYMPOSIUM TO SUPPORT VICTIMS OF TERRORISM

Tomorrow’s symposium on supporting victims of terrorism –- the first of its kind at the United Nations –- was not a political event, but an attempt to “fill a real gap in the world’s consciousness” on how States, international organizations and civil society can better address victims’ needs, a key adviser to the world body’s Secretary-General stressed today.

“While the United Nations has convened meetings for victims of various kinds of atrocities in the past, we have never brought together a global meeting addressing the issue of victims of terrorism,” Robert Orr, Assistant Secretary-General and Chair of the Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force, said at a Headquarters press conference.

He went on to say that the one-day Symposium on “Supporting Victims of Terrorism” would be “historic and unprecedented”, offering an important occasion to put a human face on the tragedy suffered by survivors and victims’ families. “It is solely designed to focus on concrete ways to better support victims around the world.” The world would be surprised by the stories that would be told because the cameras went off once the “twisted metal and charred remains” were cleared from the scenes of various terrorist attacks around the world. Victims of terrorism “just don’t have a voice [and] we must see that they have a platform”, he added.

Terrorism not only dehumanized victims, but the societies in which they lived, he explained. “We often hear the voices of terrorists, but too seldom do we hear the voices and stories of victims.” Indeed, victims and survivors were crucial in the fight against terrorism to provide a better understanding of long-term needs and to “humanize” the events, thus helping prevent future terrorist acts by convincing people to pursue their grievances in other ways.

He stressed that the media had a key role to play in that regard, noting that the entire event tomorrow would be open to the press and urging reporters to “make full use of this unprecedented opportunity”. Further, the Secretary-General would hold a midday press conference featuring 4 of the 18 victims scheduled to participate in the Symposium. They would include Ingrid Betancourt, the former Colombian presidential candidate kidnapped in 2002 by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and rescued by Colombian forces some 10 weeks ago with 14 other hostages. Upon request, some of the victims and 10 experts attending the event would take individual interviews.

Among other objectives, Mr. Orr said, the Secretary-General hoped the Symposium would present an opportunity to start changing the “often strained” dynamics between Member States and victims, who too often felt their needs went ignored or unrecognized by their Governments. At the same time, Governments often felt the sting of doing too little and reacted defensively. “This dynamic must change if we are to help victims and fight terrorism.” Indeed, many Governments had stepped up their efforts to care for victims and it was to be hoped that tomorrow’s Symposium would open dialogue on developing best practices for victim support.

He said victims, experts, civil society, journalists, international organizations and Governments attending the Symposium could participate in an open exchange towards overcoming barriers and strengthening mutual trust. On the basis of such a dialogue, the Secretariat hoped the Symposium would also provide a starting point for “building a grand coalition against terrorism”.

He continued: “The adoption in 2006 -- and reaffirmation last week -- of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy signals Governments’ support to renew unreservedly their efforts to implement its provisions, including those on victims of terrorism.” But Governments would not be able to do that on their own; it would take strong partnerships involving Governments, civil society “and, most importantly, the voices of victims of terrorism to move us ahead”.

On the specifics of tomorrow’s event, he said the Secretary-General had invited a “microcosm of victims from around the world” to participate, including five (victims of attacks) from the Middle East, five from Europe, two from Eurasia, three from Africa, two from the Americas and one from Asia. “These are amazing people who have not only suffered much, but who have given even more [by] advocating for other victims, built networks and institutions to help victims and bravely offered themselves up to the glare of public scrutiny in order to help others.”

He said the invited experts also represented all regions, cultures, religions and professional specializations, reflecting worldwide expertise. Three were from Asia, three from Africa, two from Europe, one from the Middle East and one from the Americas. Their areas of specialization ranged from organizing victims’ assistance networks to analysing victims’ experiences, and some had themselves been victims. Others had been invited because they had helped victims recover from other types of conflict or violence. Indeed, one of the Symposium’s purposes was to better learn and apply the experiences of helping victims in other contexts to the question of victims of terrorism, “one of the most neglected types of victims in the world today”.

Mr. Orr then took a raft of questions, most of which focused on the vetting of the participants, the overall composition of the list, the General Assembly’s long-acknowledged stalemate over an agreed definition of terrorism, and journalists’ perception that certain Member States were either being overlooked or unfairly targeted.

He stressed that there was, in fact, a solid legal basis on which the Organization and the wider international community could proceed: 16 international legal instruments –- 13 conventions and three protocols –- that identified “acts of terrorism”, including terrorist bombing, kidnapping, hijacking and financing of terrorism.

On the issue of State terrorism, he acknowledged that it was not mentioned in any of the conventions, but emphasized to several reporters that the Observer Mission of Palestine had been invited to participate in the Symposium, simultaneously with all other Member States and observers. Indeed, one expert attending the event was Palestinian. “The victims that the Secretary-General has invited have suffered from an act of terrorism, as defined by those legal instruments.”

Responding to a question about the selection of participants, he said the Task Force’s working group on victims had been charged with submitting suggestions of any victims and experts; civil society groups around the world had been consulted for input; and, in the case of each victim, the Member State of their nationality had been consulted. The Secretariat had not tried to vet every victim or expert with the wider membership: “I think you can appreciate that that would not have worked.” The criteria for and process of selection had been based on the broadest elements of consensus among Member States –- agreed international legal instruments –- in to “keep politics as far out of this as possible”.

Asked whether the Secretariat was worried about the Symposium turning into a politicized event, he said that, while it was not worried, some critical issues were best addressed “up front”. Everyone was aware that one of the reasons for an international event in support of victims of terrorism was the gridlock over questions of definition. At the same time, Member States had taken a pragmatic step two years ago to address “obvious and real needs” by adopting the Counter-Terrorism Strategy rather than putting their decision on hold while such definition issues were hashed out. “Adoption of the Strategy opened the door for the holding of such an event for the fist time.”

“We know that there are sensitive issues. We’re not naïve,” he continued, underscoring that everything possible had been done to ensure that the Symposium stayed focused on the victims and what they needed. Victims, experts and international organizations participating had been asked to respect those ground rules. Mr. Orr added that there were other venues in the United Nations where political issues could be raised.

To suggestions that victims of terrorist attacks in such countries as Afghanistan, Pakistan and Somalia were not participating in the Symposium, Mr. Orr emphasized the “very difficult situations” in those countries. While the Task Force had tried hard, particularly to secure participation by Afghan victims, identifying and contacting people in those environments who were willing and able to come to New York and take part in such an open forum had been extremely challenging. “I would like to have had someone from Afghanistan; the burden of victimhood is such that it would have been important […] we tried and unfortunately we ended up without anyone.”

In fact, until a few days ago, it had looked as if the list of participants might have been longer, but logistical challenges and other sensitivities had caused some to drop out, he continued. “Coming to an international forum to talk about their own grief was maybe more than they wanted at this time.” That was probably most true for victims of recent terrorist violence.

The Task Force had also worked to find participants from Iraq and Iran, he said, stressing that, overall, while “the list was not perfect”, weighed against regional, religious or cultural criteria, it was a fair representation of worldwide statistics on terrorism, including where it happened and to whom.

In conclusion, Mr. Orr stressed that the United Nations was examining how it could better address the needs of its own terrorism-affected staff. “This is personal for the Secretary-General and all of us who work at the UN, just like it’s personal for the communities and countries around the world that have suffered from terrorism.” The Symposium was a fist step in the global dialogue about victims of terrorism.

* *** *
For information media • not an official record